酒中仙2022-01-03 04:03:57

van上3人被甩出死亡。谁的责任大?如何判?

Multiple passengers in the minivan were ejected from the vehicle on impact. Two were pronounced dead by first responders and another was pronounced dead at a hospital.

Four others involved suffered injuries and remain hospitalized: The minivan driver and two passengers and the RAV4 driver, the vehicle’s sole occupant.

Deputies said the Sienna minivan didn’t yield at an intersection while attempting to turn left onto Barkers Branch Drive. The RAV4, traveling north on Barker Cypress Road, then struck the right, back quarter of the minivan.

The RAV4 driver exhibited signs of intoxication at the scene and told deputies she had been drinking.

“She exhibited clues of being intoxicated while driving but the contributing factor at this time right now is going to be on the other vehicle until it’s reconstructed to determine if the RAV4, which she was operating, may have been speeding at the time,” a deputy on scene said.

chinomango2022-01-03 05:02:45
酒驾和违规左转各有罚款金额,剩下看法官的好恶;看来没系安全带,中国人吗?
酒中仙2022-01-03 13:07:50
不知道。看遇难的人算在谁头上
随缘随喜2022-01-03 14:22:00
就现有信息看, 错在MINIVAN。 除非酒驾方严重超速。
原上草20172022-01-03 14:33:54
觉得如果酒驾者没有违规行驶,不应该负车祸责任,酒驾当然要罚,这是两码事,应该分别处理。 肇事的是Van的驾驶者。
酒中仙2022-01-03 14:55:04
当酒后开动车时,就已经违法了,在违法过程中发生的任何事故,酒驾都要负大责任。
原上草20172022-01-03 16:35:31
希望能够看到后续,法庭最后是怎样判决的。这事件明显是Van 的驾驶犯错,不觉得主要责任由酒驾的人负责。
随缘随喜2022-01-03 22:03:09
也有道理。如果受害方辩论说如果不是酒驾,最后至少能减速度,不至于严重伤亡。 看律师和法官了。
原上草20172022-01-03 22:14:36
酒驾有错毫无疑问,但是车祸完全是Van 错误开到对方的车道引起,应该负这方面的责任。
TBz2022-01-04 02:54:38
不论酒驾与否,不减速或者没有及时减速就撞上去没有法律责任。
khyang862022-01-04 21:48:31
撞擊奌在Minivan後半部,代表Minivan先進入交會奌,如果沒有酒駕,很可能就閃過去了
單身老貓2022-01-05 13:14:59
酒駕肇事導致另一車上駕駛與乘客致死屬於刑事上一級過失殺人. 這是重罪控罪
chinomango2022-01-06 01:53:34
那么减速反而有责任?
TBz2022-01-06 04:39:50
我没有这个意思
TBz2022-01-06 04:42:51
关键词“导致”