BaoBaoBaoMa2006-10-16 16:25:48
等了一年多NIW, 等来了一封莫名其妙的refer. (NSC)

1. Attestations from current and prior supervisors tend also to support a conclusion that the national interest would NOT be adversely affected if an employer were to request permanent employment certification from the Department of Labor, and to file an immigrant petition on what would then be the alien petitioner’s behalf. In addition, the petitioner indicates he does not want his employment prospects to be limited to the University of XXX which would be the case if the University were to file a labor certification in his behalf.

查遍了我的材料, 推荐信没有一点点这个意思(to support a conclusion that the national interest would NOT be adversely affected if an employer were to request permanent employment certification from the Department of Labor, and to file an immigrant petition on what would then be the alien petitioner’s behalf.) 我自己在解释为什么不做labor clearance时, 表示为研究工作, 不愿受雇主限制. 为什么移民官会这样理解, 如何应对?

我应给出什么理由, the national interest would be adversely affected if an employer were to request permanent employment certification from the Department of Labor.

2. Please experts’ letters attesting to the impact that the alien petitioner’s work has had to cancer research.

我的研究领域是fuel cell, 燃料电池, 与癌症cancer相差十万八千里. 是不是移民官没仔细读案子, 或根本不懂, 看见了cell就当成了cancer? 还是把我的案子和别人的混了, 还是笔误? 我该如何回答呢?

请诸位大侠分析帮忙, 感激不尽.
jiebai2006-10-16 17:52:33
Did you see your cover litter before it's ted?
BaoBaoBaoMa2006-10-16 17:53:41
I did it.
xiaobaitu2006-10-16 18:44:27
你对NIW的标准理解是错误的,不愿意被雇主限制不能是NIW的申请理由
BaoBaoBaoMa2006-10-16 19:40:50
谢谢,
WorthIt2006-10-17 02:28:33
值得商榷!!
fsa20002006-10-17 04:23:03
回复:小白兔等大侠请帮忙, NIW refer disaster