中国官方版本的加勒万河谷之战地点，和真实历史里的冲突事发位置差别在哪？ 希影2021-02-25 21:54:50

 

显然，中方画出来的地点选择，目的是为了把印度说成是跨过实控线的侵略一方。问题是，当时真是这样的吗？

 

Chinese state media tonight released some footage from one of the clashes along the Galwan river that took place on June 15th. It's tricky to geolocate but my best idea (explained below) is that it shows Chinese forces SLIGHTY (<50m) beyond their interpretation of the LAC. pic.twitter.com/SOGHKrxb9V

— Nathan Ruser (@Nrg8000) February 19, 2021

In later shots you can see that there's a large landslide slip to that rock, which I believer you can SLIGHTLY see in the satellite imagery (shadows make it hard) and it is certainly not before the LAC. pic.twitter.com/LaGpaFBI3p

— Nathan Ruser (@Nrg8000) February 19, 2021

Finally, there is a short clip that includes footage of the final 'frontline' one of the tents built on that sandbank at the 'bend-in-the-river', with Chinese soldiers lining up in front of it, and this position is considerably back from where the Chinese forced started. pic.twitter.com/lWYt5X863e

— Nathan Ruser (@Nrg8000) February 19, 2021

But, in short, IF one considers the river itself to mark the LAC at that bend in the Galwan Valley, Chinese forces had crossed the river (really a stream) by the time contact between them and Indian forced began on the afternoon of the 15th. pic.twitter.com/jd1VNwzQuN

— Nathan Ruser (@Nrg8000) February 19, 2021

As you only have one job, antiChina, whatever you says, no one w

爱国就请写中文，谢谢。

评论要有根据。不论站在什么立场，首先要问的是，当时真实发生的是什么？

说得好，印度是当事国，竟然一张现场照片都拿不出来，更别提录像了，做贼心虚？

谁说没有？去年消息刚传出来，就有照片流出。印方阵亡士兵名字人数第一时间公布

拿一张来看看，现场的，录像最好，别拿其他冲突的顶替，最好的是祁团长做背景的从印方角度拍的

逻辑错误。印度总理说了真话，中国没有进入印度。中国发表的视频显示河的两岸都是拿着冷兵器的印度士兵。证明了过界的是印度，

请拿出土工多次伏击的证据，最烦胡扯，说话之前请把证据准备好。

那是双方战力相差悬殊，伤亡数悬殊，一旦公布印度民族主义脸面何在，不利局势降温，印度会被逼铤而走险，战事扩大。

印度現時主要官方语言是印地语，第二官方语言为英语[3]，印度宪法规定“联邦官方语言为使用天城体字母的印地...

打脸美不？潘金莲就爱现眼，不学无术的井底之蛙

没有举可靠证据说清楚“真实历史里的冲突事发位置”在哪里，也没有论证中国政府的录像不真的依据什么？