7 分钟时限杀伤力太强，中丞的警告没起作用 三河匹夫2019-01-22 21:19:44

城里城外常见精美无瑕，超乎自然的片子。近几日城里有些关于PS 的帖子讨论，俺想起多时前读过 National Geographic 的 assignment 主持人关于入围的二段话, 尤其最后那句。读完后专精 PS 的决心一落万丈 （李中丞2018年底不能断崖式下跌的警告太晚了），谁让咱这么没定力。

话说回来，能把黑夜变成白天也是孙猴子级的本事，NG无非一家之言。萝卜白菜各有所好。闲话少说，把原文照载如下，特向原作者 Moyer 致谢。

 

A few things to keep in mind...

I would suggest you lean towards the authentic with your images. Heavily post-processing (for example: extreme sharpening, clarity, luminance) will push an image OUT of consideration. If you spend more than seven minutes on an image “making it work” in Photoshop, most likely you are having to “fix” something that doesn’t work. Keep it simple, lightly adjust contrast, exposure, perhaps a slight tweak of the color. Trust that you made the image you wanted to make in the field and resist the temptation to “improve” it by heavily using software. This is not an assignment about Photoshop or Lightroom. This is about how you see in the field with just you and your camera.

Keep up the good work!

Matt Moyer 
Nat Geo photographer

 

http://yourshot.nationalgeographic.com/assignments/my-best-photos-2017/?u=416&_ga=2.109733893.1669534089.1514125738-691524571.1509070729#editor

This is about how you see in the field with just you and 。。。

同意这句所说言简意深，应该与NG 报道讲究真实感有关。谢港君。

说到PS，数字相机本身就是一种程序的PS过程。这也造就了不同牌子的相机同一设定下出来的结果不同。

同意！

完全同意！我通常是用简单的Picasa稍微调调光，稍加剪辑，或许修正歪斜。如果大幅度PS，那是另一种艺术创作。

v的那张黄色的扫街片，正是是调了下影调，色调，锐化了下嘛~ ：）

不能联系实际啊。伦敦街拍和NG 的基本标准显然不一样，大概进不了NG 的视线。

7 分钟大概是报道型照片的大体时限吧，我从那以后PS 也收敛到有限做。

这类例子就像当年柯达与阿哥法胶卷的成像差别了。

好分享！

看了几贴谈到PS, 忽然想起这个当年读过的就贴上。谢了。