Lao2282006-02-08 20:10:43
->很多所谓的IE问题不是单纯的IE问题,而是系统的问题。(不是微软才有系统问题)

It is not 单纯的IE问题, but a IE design problems - binding is the culprit (or we can say Windows design problems, but IE is an application on Windows). Let's simplify it. If there is no binding, IE can be much more free from the security troubles and protects Windows better. Binding is two side blade.

->用FF/Opera不解决系统的问题。就这么简单。
That's true. Both behaves excelent on different platforms. They have less security problems on OS.

->对同一个用户而言,如果你有心去装FF等,你也可以用那些时间/精力配好IE并更新系统,补上漏洞。后者才是关键。
Do you mean it takes the same "时间/精力配好IE并更新系统,补上漏洞" as that to install FF? If so, can you please give us your value results?

->FF的很多功能在基於IE的外壳上都可以实现,而且这些外壳有很多FF没有的功能。而这些外壳往往比FF要小得多。
Do you know how many customers know how to use 外壳? Is the 外壳 the browser or IE?
王树临风2006-02-09 01:08:48
强烈反对楼主的看法。
lao2282006-02-09 02:15:21
If you want 外行 ignore the security issues then ...
lao2282006-02-09 03:36:01
IE的捆绑使IE赢得了市场和你所谓的易用性,却带来
ppzcgg2006-02-09 05:21:02
宣传 FF 等最负面的地方就在于宣传你这种认识
ppzcgg2006-02-09 05:30:31
哈哈。我真被你搞迷糊了。你好象是不希望
lao2282006-02-09 05:52:17
不知是你误解我,或我误解你?
Lao2282006-02-09 06:01:22
我不同意你文中的观点并不等于"宣传 FF 是万灵药"
王树临风2006-02-09 17:08:24
lao228 的漏洞。。
王树临风2006-02-09 17:15:52
lao228 又中计了,
Lao2282006-02-09 19:44:06
Why do you avoid talking about "binding"
Lao2282006-02-09 19:50:40
World Wide cares the security very much now
Lao2282006-02-09 20:28:52
Here is something you maybe interested in