fuz2021-12-28 09:16:43

Striking antibody evasion manifested by the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-03826-3

 

The Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) was only recently detected in southern Africa, but its subsequent spread has been extensive, both regionally and globally1. It is expected to become dominant in the coming weeks2, probably due to enhanced transmissibility. A striking feature of this variant is the large number of spike mutations3 that pose a threat to the efficacy of current COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) vaccines and antibody therapies4. This concern is amplified by the findings from our study. We found B.1.1.529 to be markedly resistant to neutralization by serum not only from convalescent patients, but also from individuals vaccinated with one of the four widely used COVID-19 vaccines. Even serum from persons vaccinated and boosted with mRNA-based vaccines exhibited substantially diminished neutralizing activity against B.1.1.529. By evaluating a panel of monoclonal antibodies to all known epitope clusters on the spike protein, we noted that the activity of 17 of the 19 antibodies tested were either abolished or impaired, including ones currently authorized or approved for use in patients. In addition, we also identified four new spike mutations (S371L, N440K, G446S, and Q493R) that confer greater antibody resistance to B.1.1.529. The Omicron variant presents a serious threat to many existing COVID-19 vaccines and therapies, compelling the development of new interventions that anticipate the evolutionary trajectory of SARS-CoV-2.

 

 

 

注:

1. 该研究指出:现有的疫苗和使用各种抗体的免疫疗法,对O变无效、或低效。亟需开发新疫苗和单抗

2. 本篇为TBz和Dudaan贴子提供科研成果支持

https://bbs.wenxuecity.com/bbs/health/1012100.html

https://bbs.wenxuecity.com/health/1011972.html

 

 

阿明.2021-12-28 09:34:00
与楼下Dudaan发的是类似的研究,结论也一样。都是发表在Nature上的。
solo12021-12-28 11:24:42
如果自然免疫对Omicron也失效,那么麻烦就大了,就像润涛阎预测的那样美国要四年死亡两百万。
阿明.2021-12-28 11:43:20
流感,普通感冒的自然感染抗体都是有时效的,过几个月就衰减了。何况还有病毒变异。
DSc2021-12-28 12:42:15
你答选择题,9个错,一个对,评分还是不及格。有啥好吹的。OMICRON死亡率比流感 低,你的说法无任何理论根据也无数据支持。
solo12021-12-28 15:31:59
做预测当然有可能错,但不是十有九错,十有九对还不够。润涛阎预测美国选举30年无一错误,所以他的预测值得注意。
TBz2021-12-28 16:39:07
还记得章鱼帝的预测吗?