葛朗台22007-05-06 21:55:26
葛朗台本人filed law suit against INS and FBI to save a buck or two. (stuck in name check for N-400 filing,interview was on 4/17/06, and was told the only thing missing is the name check approval). Followed are the facts, 敬请指教:

2/6/07 Complaint filed

4/27/07 Last day to meet and confer re: initial disclosure, early settlement, ADR process selection and discovery plan or file joint ADR certification with stipulation to ADR process or notice of need for ADR phone conference. b>(DID NOT TAKE ANY ACTION BESIDES SERVED ALL THE DEFENDANTS.)

5/11/07 Will be the last day to complete initial disclosure or state objection in Rule 26(f) report, file casre management statement and ile/serve rule 26(f) report.

5/18/07 case management conference in Oakland.

4/30/07 received answer from attorneys for defendants stating that the court should dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

4/25/07 received a letter from US Dept of Homeland Securities SF office requesting additional info to prove marital status from 4/26/06 to present (interview date was 4/17/06) and asked to do another finger print since the first one expired.

葛朗台想知道, 4/25/07 移民局的信是不是因为诉讼, 才重新审理移民案件(on the letter, there is an officer name, also hand writing "amended request" and "mandamus";还是只是因为指模过期了。

葛朗台寻问了陈丹虹事务所, 要收费$2500 接过诉讼。 心疼!!

请问各位高人,如何处理。 急!!

先谢了!!
xiaobaitu2007-05-07 01:02:19
这点很难判断,不过要求fingerprint就提供,dismiss与否不是
葛朗台22007-05-07 02:21:31
回复:这点很难判断,不过要求fingerprint就提供,dismiss与否不是
xiaobaitu2007-05-07 02:46:56
5/18那天是第一次开庭,法官不可能那天就做出判决,所以那天
葛朗台22007-05-07 04:28:18
回复:5/18那天是第一次开庭,法官不可能那天就做出判决,所以那天