1. The new VB doesn't aim to any individual, it is generalized by the analysists.

2. They themselves didn't expect all quota was used up in June when they moved VB to Jan 2006;

3. The policy is issued based on USA national interests, not on the Chinese or Indian interests;

4. No individual sentamention or discriminationism was involved in the policy because the VB is applied to all people from all over the world, and USA is an immigrant country;

5. Chinese is only a very very small minority in the whole nationalities in the country;

6. Chinese should be calm down quickly in order to get interest they need through legal pathway (appealing by parade or calss appeal by medium etc)but not through lawsuit;

7. Based on the above claim, no lawsuit can change the situation and national policy at all;

8. AILA knows this very well and appeal the class lawsuit against USCIS or DOS, which is no use at all;

9. Item 8 can only make AILA super famous and rich, but only make no any effects on national immigrant policy a bit change at all because senate has scattered the new immigrant law admendment last Thursday. Lawsuite can only make AILA rich but can't sue agains the whole goverment, legeslation, etc.
soldanella2007-07-02 19:42:32
tmd骂它丫的两句就过激了?他们怎么耍我们都该?有天理吗?
昔日2007-07-02 19:43:17
那你说怎么办。少在这里说风凉话,站着说话不腰疼。
soldanella2007-07-02 19:45:51
它的意思是我们被玩死活该.因为是少数民族,就该被玩死
iiijjj2007-07-02 19:46:17
that's bullshit. if they did it on or before 6/30, it
灌水专用名2007-07-02 19:51:21
写这种东西的人是站着说话不腰痛
manbepositive2007-07-02 19:52:59
对,支持ALIA!
suzieQ2007-07-02 19:57:06
回复:You are right!写这种东西的人是站着说话不腰痛