sylj1232010-09-02 00:50:29
claim了authorship, 但是因为引用很少,发了8篇文章,现在才3个独立引用

被TSC 0001打回来了,原文如下

No claim is made as to the number of occasions colleagues have officially
cited these articles in any of their professionally published articles. A
check this date of the search engine Google Scholar fails to reveal any of
these written pieces has ever been so cited.

The reality is that never having been cited by other professionals in your
field can not be seen as commensurate with someone who can be considered as
an outstanding researcher in biomedical engineering. This is especially true
in any physical science field, in which written publication of ideas and
research results is also frequentlly seen.

If the beneficiary's work in **** or anything else was on the level of
someone truly deserving of the outstanding designation, it is reasonable to
assume her published works would be have been cited by other similarly
employed professionals on any number of occasion.

Therefore, this criterion has not been met.

我 claim 了review, 已经通过了, original contribution 也没能通过,先请大家
帮忙看看,
authorship这条能有什么办法不?

Yet, these and other compliments of the beneficiary notwithstanding, nothing
in the record firmly and documentarily establishes the beneficiary has made
any truly original contributions to any aspect of ***** that is of such
definitely profound significance and on a level expected from an outstanding
researcher that it greatly altered the thinking and/or approach of a very
sizable swath of similarly employed researcher and personnel. Too, nothing
in the record indicates any of the beneficiary’s ideas and research results
have been widely implemented in her field in any intensely compelling and
influential way.

Underscoring this are two salient items in the record.

First, the beneficiary cannot be seen as having made a significantly
original contributions to **** simply due to the perceived overall societal
importance of the area of study.

Second, some of the evidence submitted with the petition is devoted to
potential future implications of the beneficiary’s work.

Therefore, this criterion has not been met.
sylj1232010-09-02 02:39:07
help!! EB1b denied!!
luck072010-09-03 16:43:01
请问你的case是什么时候file的? PP了吗?