1.LABEL 很清楚.PETITION LETTER 后面每一个EXHIBIT前面都有一个PARTITION,每个PARTITION上面都有一个编号.
Answer:
They did not say the exibits were not clearly labeled. They meant your materials were not well organized to support what you claimed in your application. Or simply it means you might have used unrelated materials as evidence because you do not have other strong evidence.
2.引用一个CASE只是说明材料按这个CASE来组织
Each case is unique because of different backgrounds.
They do not care how you organize materials in your case in a particular way. But they do care how you use those materials to support what you claimed in your application.
3.引用BUSH 的讲话等只是借官方之口来说明我研究领域的重要性.
It is fine to cite the words from Bush (But do not cite whole speech of Bush!!) That is not enough. You need to demonstrate how excellent you are (superior to your peers?) and what impacts of your research work.
4.难道只有第一作者文章被引用能作为RECONITION的证据第二第三作者的文章被引用就不能列出来吗?
You should focus on the citations of your first authorship papers. If you do need the citatations from coauthorship publications, you need to demonstrate specifically what and how much you contributed to that paper (such as the letter from first author to prove what you said). You can mention them but do not focus on them. In a word, you need to demonstrate you are superior to your peers. If all citations from your coauthorship publications, how can you prove you are superior to your peers if you just have coauthorship publications.
5.学术机构的奖项不能拿出来作为证明材料吗?
Yes, you can but not always. It depends on the purpose.
Anyway, said is easier than done. You may need to get a copy of successful petition letter from your friends, and then use it to discuss with your lawyer and knowledge him.
Take your own responsibility to your case even if you hire a lawyer. Your case is almost everything for you but not everything for your lawyer since you are just one of his clients. Good luck to your case.