SDUSA2018-12-01 17:01:14

China fought three wars in the 20th century: Against U.S. and U.N. forces in the 1950 to 1953 Korean War, a brief war against India in 1962, and another brief war against Vietnam in 1979. The first two wars were generally favorable to China’s mass infantry tactics and benefited from large numbers of combat veterans in the PLA ranks.

 

The 1979 war against Vietnam, on the other hand, is generally regarded to have been a fiasco. China invaded Vietnam in the spring of 1979, only to discover that its tried and tested tactics worked poorly against the battle-hardened, more experienced Vietnamese Army. China lost an estimated 30,000 killed in action in just one month of grinding combat, with a high proportion of wounded to killed in action and a logistics system that couldn’t sustain even the shortest of supply lines into a neighboring country.

Now, nearly forty years later, some are wondering if history could repeat itself and China could lose the next war for the same reasons: inexperience in the ranks. A new article in Foreign Policy argues that this could be the deciding factor in China’s next war, and that the PLA could be a “force or a flop."

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/navy-ships/a25322576/is-the-chinese-military-ready-for-war/

青松站2018-12-01 18:26:44
服了美专家们,还在用1979中国对越,那时候的思维分析…-~--
mltd2018-12-01 19:29:48
现在如果在干越南,将是是一场屠杀,如果解放军动用海陆空导弹等最先进武器
青松站2018-12-01 19:46:30
海上也许是十二有限度",美国人不少大概依然是30年前的思维,那位72岁的"老蓝波八年演员,表示愿意加入明年的"新蓝波电影",一一
thrawn2018-12-01 22:01:33
损失大点但可以战争中学习。维和、护航、西边反恐、南边反毒、于俄罗斯交流都是好经验