我觉得这就是歼10的正确描述 xsing2020-01-01 11:36:51

F-16 is a proven platform. The performance could be verified by the third party, as F-16 exported to many oversea customers, Gripen also has its buyers.

F-2 is a licensed variant of F-16 with some improvements, or it’s considered as F-16 customized by Japan.

J-10 is a non proven design, no oversea buyers, the Lavi design which they told that J-10 based on, isn’t the non proven design as well.

So who can compare those ?

要实事求是，别像武术一样吹牛。一打就暴了，然后就说没发内功怕伤了对方，：）

不好意思，此乃转发，中立的做法。

我看了一下，这里应该不用with, 呵呵

墙外没人在乎这个, 结果等比了再说。

who can compare J-10 with those (F-16 and F-2)

显然他不清楚作者要表达什么意思

这一句 “the Lavi design ... isn’t the non proven design as well." 似

不用with

作者的意思是, Lavi都不是, 何况10

太中国了, 呵呵

Lavi 后面那个they指代不明吧

链接呢？

虽然知道作者的意思但其英文都乱写把is a写成isn't the

Lavi是以色列用F16改进而来的而J10是中国用Lavi改进而来的。J10的确没打过仗是难证明，只能用旁证。

+100

I don’t know nothing about this

呵呵，看来，两岸的J10和F16V，不交手，这些无厘头的吵架，还会没完没了。