先来看这段
https://www.yahoo.com/news/sidney-powells-legal-defense-reasonable-152300899.html
... ...
“No reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact,” Powell's attorneys said in a court filing defending her against a billion-dollar defamation lawsuit
... ...
Powell, ..., repeatedly and baselessly claimed that votes were illegally switched on Dominion voting machines. Election experts and officials, as well as top law enforcement officials, have said the 2020 election results were accurate and there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud in the U.S.
对中国所谓种族灭绝的指控难道不是repeatedly and baselessly？指控甚至提不出一个时间点，维族人口10年间增加了20%，有这么种族灭绝的么？
鲍威尔的辩护词是说有正常头脑的人都知道指控不是事实，这也适用于关于种族灭绝的指控。那么鲍威尔当时为什么要这么做呢，她自己说是因为当时的政治形势，也就是说出于政治目的。
如果说对新疆人权的指控，尚且可以认为西方人对新疆不了解，即使了解，也可以有讨论的地方，种族灭绝那么大一定帽子，有人说还有人信就太过分了，穆斯林国家有相信的吗？有正常头脑的人能得出这个结论吗？这其实反而弱化了西方对人权方面的指控，说明指控方根本不在乎事实的，只在乎是否对自己有用，所以人权问题没得讨论，中国怎么做都是错的。
说说民主党政府吧，当你们对大选舞弊指控感到愤怒时，自己做得比川普阵营好多少？再说说欧盟，当你们对美国大选出现的问题表明一些态度时，自己为什么愿意相信缺少事实的指控？看看多数亚洲国家，多数穆斯林国家，有谁附和？
一个结论，西方太虚伪了。