haole9992007-10-18 03:02:51
今天收到法庭Order要求原告和被告先协商一个解决方案,法庭然后再当庭听证双方辩论,最后做出本案的终裁。如果双方有一致的解决意见,法庭也可以直接按照原告和被告双方的意见下Order,这样也就免去上庭听证了。有没有可能和政府律师面谈“私了”?本人在此恳请高人指点下一步的行动!多谢!!!
bioinfo2007-10-18 03:23:25
回复:WOM案子出现转机,恳请高人指点下一步!!!
radiology2007-10-18 03:26:51
回复:上庭私了,原告的目的是要加快NC速度,只要能达成
haole9992007-10-18 03:34:38
回复:回复:WOM案子出现转机,恳请高人指点下一步!!!
pjiang2007-10-18 03:38:07
Here is a recent won case for your good reference. - 回复:WOM案子出现转
haole9992007-10-18 03:52:49
多谢了!!!
haole9992007-10-18 03:53:55
多谢鼓励!!!
haole9992007-10-18 03:58:07
Bioinfo: 你是说AUSA政府律师可以重新再次递交MTD吗?
bioinfo2007-10-18 04:16:55
yes, if they didn't agree with your response to MTD
bioinfo2007-10-18 04:23:17
回复:回复:回复:WOM案子出现转机,恳请高人指点下一步!!!
haole9992007-10-18 04:24:48
这次法庭的order已经明确写明了AUSA的MTD被DENIED, AUSA还可以在交新的MTD吗?
haole9992007-10-18 04:53:37
Bioinfo: 本案的特点就在于(见内)...
bitterness2007-10-18 05:36:44
me too
six1102007-10-18 07:41:21
回复:好象法官想帮你并给AUSA一个台阶下,也不想搞个
bioinfo2007-10-18 16:46:50
then you won, expect to get GC soon, good job
bioinfo2007-10-18 16:50:06
回复:这次法庭的order已经明确写明了AUSA的MTD被DENIED, AUSA还可以在交新的MTD吗?
NCENDLESSWAITING2007-10-18 17:15:44
Please share your WOM info - Which court you are in?
bioinfo2007-10-18 18:30:49
回复:me too
haole9992007-10-18 19:02:35
in the Missouri Eastern District (MOED)