dashan722007-10-19 15:34:27
Pjiang, BT and all other respected experters:

Thanks very much for Pjiang’s invaluable and kind and big help provided yesterday evening!. I am going to reply to USCIS and send all package back to TSC as Pjiang suggested. however sorry bother you all again.

Do you think I need to attach an official document from internet to show the old 140/485 application fees was applied to the postmarked prior to 7/30? If so, is it possible that you can provide an official link for this since I did not find the info from theinternet.

One more thing I want your help: I found from the returned package that I made a mistake for Kid’s 485 application: For my kid’s 485 application ( under 14 years old), the old fee for the application was $225, but I sent a check of $295 which included finger printer fee of $70, which is unnecessary for kids’ 485 application.

My question: Which fee, old fee/$225 or new fee $600 should I pay for my kid’s 485 application when I send back all materials to TSC? If 225$ still applied to my kid’s 485 at our current situation, do you think I need to write another check for additional processing or administration fee besides from preparing a check of $225 for USCIS?

Yes, I submitted 2 copies of EAT 750 B forms with I-140 on 7/28. Thus my NIW application do not need to file 9089 form.

Thank you so much.




Yesterday's message and reply from Pjiang:

I mailed NIW I140/485/131 cases for me and my family on 7/28 morning from a postoffice to TSC using express mail. Package arrived to TSC on 7/30 on time, but tracking in the web showed my package was asked to waiting, so it was signed by a people of TSC ON 7/31/2007. I used old application fees (before 7/30/2007)

Now, all my application was return to me.

The reason in the notice:

1) they say application fee are not right, ask me to use the new application fees effective from 7/30
- USCIS made mistake, old fees apply as long postmarked prior to 7/30

2) they say my application is missing I-797 approval notice for I140
- USCIS' 2nd mistake, you indicate "concurrent filing"

3) they say: cocurrent filing; A certified orginal lable certification (form ETA 9089) issued by the Department of Lable must be accompamny the I-140 petition.
- USCIS' 3rd mistake, if you included ETA-950B
pjiang2007-10-19 16:18:44
回复:Please help again 回复:Pjang BT and other teachers, help my ca
dashan722007-10-19 17:57:43
Pjiang, Many thanks. 回复:回复:Please help again 回复:Pjang BT and ot