ppy2009-05-28 02:57:57
昨天接到TSC xm102 officer的 notice of intent to deny. 其中有一条如下:

E: Evidence of the alien’s original scientific or scholarly research contributions to the academic field;

Provide evidence to establish the significance of the beneficiary’s scientific or scholarly research with regard to its originality, contribution to the academic field, and how it set the beneficiary apart individually as an internationally-recognized outstanding research compared to all others in the academic field.

Evidence previously submitted does not indicate the beneficiary’s individual contributions. All contributions appear to be shared. Unless it’s the beneficiary’s original contribution, it’s cannot be considered.

我的paper和项目,都需要两个到三个不同组的合作,papers都是在chemistry和biochemistry 最top的杂志发表的。

推荐信里强调了我的贡献,但看完所给的notice,这个officer应该没读推荐信。

请问大侠们,如何回答这officer的问题比较好呢!

非常感谢您的回复!

kelvincsc2009-05-28 03:04:22
回复:各位大侠, 急问如何证明work ”original“ (EB1bI-140 intent to deny)
Sparty2009-05-28 03:10:36
是不是被逐条反驳了?
cef2009-05-28 03:20:13
回复:各位大侠, 急问如何证明work ”original“ (EB1bI-140 intent to deny)
ppy2009-05-28 03:38:06
EB1b 140 教训及背景 回复:是不是被逐条反驳了?
Sparty2009-05-28 03:59:33
我放了几个小奖上去,但没有进行什么评点,只是放上去而已,