弓尒2019-08-03 00:06:52

 

General of the Army Omar Bradley.jpg

(February 12, 1893 – April 8, 1981) 

General of the Army Omar N. Bradley in 1950

Bradley was the first Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and oversaw the U.S. military's policy-making in the Korean War.

 

 

A more complete passage of Bradley's testimony is:

I am under no illusion that our present strategy of using means short of total war to achieve our ends and oppose communism is a guarantee that a world war will not be thrust upon us. But a policy of patience and determination without provoking a world war, while we improve our military power, is one which we believe we must continue to follow….

Under present circumstances, we have recommended against enlarging the war from Korea to also include Red China. The course of action often described as a limited war with Red China would increase the risk we are taking by engaging too much of our power in an area that is not the critical strategic prize.

Red China is not the powerful nation seeking to dominate the world. Frankly, in the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, this strategy would involve us in the wrong war, at the wrong place, at the wrong time, and with the wrong enemy.

— From testimony before the Senate Committees on Armed Services and Foreign Relations, May 15, 1951.—Military Situation in the Far East, hearings, 82d Congress, 1st session, part 2, p. 732 (1951).
Uusequery2019-08-03 00:15:39
漏了前面一段。。。意思全变。
青松站2019-08-03 00:17:03
中西文化或有差异,但人性是东西相通的…
Uusequery2019-08-03 00:32:57
不翻译前面的内容,仅指出三个“错误”。误导。
thrawn2019-08-03 00:45:16
言中之意也就是如果对中国开战太久是战略错误因为要集中精力对付的是苏联
洗洗睡了2019-08-03 00:47:54
说话的时间是1951年韩战之前,用的是虚拟语态
弓尒2019-08-03 01:24:11
+ 不是过去式,也不是过去完成式,但,
弓尒2019-08-03 01:25:43
呵呵, 老子还把它整篇讲话 全翻译过来呢,
弓尒2019-08-03 01:26:38
+, 是的,不是危言耸听,是发展趋势
刁小山2019-08-03 03:39:13
说的是如果和红色中国全面开战是‘三个错误’,根本不是指的朝鲜战争。朝鲜战争美国没有选择,因为是北韩先动的手
刁小山2019-08-03 03:42:02
至于谁胜谁负,争议不断是正常的。除了北韩,各方都可以说自己达到战略目标,是胜利者。
青松站2019-08-03 04:02:29
我跳一步到二战后,,
弓尒2019-08-03 04:51:26
小三儿,读书不求甚解,
刁小山2019-08-03 05:38:02
弓傻,说的是把朝鲜战争扩大到对红色中国的全面战争是‘三个错误’,根本不是朝鲜战争本身。朝鲜战争美国除了参战没有选择,
弓尒2019-08-03 06:02:46
呵呵,让老子笑掉大牙 ~!
青松站2019-08-03 06:03:57
这两件不同掛…~~
难得跟贴2019-08-03 06:09:53
应该这样理解, 前期美军 介入是正确的 ,但后面越过三八线打到鸭绿江是错误的, 这就是为什么说在错误的时间, 错误的地点 ,和错
刁小山2019-08-03 06:13:40
老子我也笑掉大牙~~!!
刁小山2019-08-03 06:17:06
对,布莱德利的意思就是不该让朝鲜战争升级,因为欧洲才是重心。但这不是说朝鲜战争本身是错误的,因为美国是被动参加没有选择
刁小山2019-08-03 06:24:05
朝鲜战争美国的确是被动参战,开始北韩就有T34,美国都没有给韩国重装备,所以美国不参战韩国50年10月前肯定亡国了
刁小山2019-08-03 07:03:44
实际上仁川登陆北韩崩溃后,即使美军停在38线,韩军自己估计也会跨过38线试图灭掉北韩残余势力的,南越北越就是最好的例子
hkzs2019-08-03 07:05:51
实际上这些wrong的意思就是说,中国连做美国对手的资格都没有。