哲学是需要好的逻辑的。别的不说，感觉石凳的逻辑很欠缺 ：D 未完的歌2022-04-26 14:23:36

老维强调人类语言的无力和极限，所以他强调可以说的都可以说清楚；不可说的那就保持沉默。

先说说你引的这一段话。首先你忘了读他上面一句，而这个恰恰是你逻辑出问题的关键。

这个文章作者说是老维想说哲学家（包括他自己）说的那些都是nonsense 。the deepest problems are in fact not problems at all。

但是哲学家的任务是什么呢？“Philosophers, then, have the task of presenting the logic of our language clearly. This will not solve important problems but it will show that some things that we take to be important problems are really not problems at all. The gain is not wisdom but an absence of confusion.

现在你明白你说的

“虽然你懂的根本算不了哲学，但人家老维说的也不是你。人家说的是那些语言论以前的西方哲学。 ”

的逻辑缺陷是什么了吧。

他说”nonsense，not problems at all“= 他说语言论以前的西方哲学不是哲学？。

即便这个成立，难道等于说中国哲学就是哲学了？

==========================

文章原话：

Wittgenstein’s aim seems to have been to show up as nonsense the things that philosophers (himself included) are tempted to say.

(你从这里开始引用）Philosophical theories, he suggests, are attempts to answer questions that are not really questions at all (they are nonsense), or to solve problems that are not really problems. He says in proposition 4.003 that:

Most of the propositions and questions of philosophers arise from our failure to understand the logic of our language. (They belong to the same class as the question whether the good is more or less identical than the beautiful.) And it is not surprising that the deepest problems are in fact not problems at all.

Philosophers, then, have the task of presenting the logic of our language clearly. This will not solve important problems but it will show that some things that we take to be important problems are really not problems at all. The gain is not wisdom but an absence of confusion. This is not a rejection of philosophy or logic. Wittgenstein took philosophical puzzlement very seriously indeed, but he thought that it needed dissolving by analysis rather than solving by the production of theories. The Tractatus presents itself as a key for untying a series of knots both profound and highly technical.