勿来三: can you deny Nanjing massacre too? Euro-dollar2019-01-31 20:11:12

You claim 二战中杀害犹太人的毒气室，绝对是上世纪最大谎言.

Then, can you talk about Nanjing massacre? In Nanjing, Japanese only used knives and guns. Could they kill 300,000 Chinese?

I once debated it with a Japanese. He claimed that the number of 300,000 is not correct.

I asked him: What is the difference between 299,999 and 300,000? Did Chinese army ever land on Japanese soil? Did Japanese army ever land on Chinese soil? 

Then, he was quiet.

因为二者的性质不同，勿楼主怎么写文章，质疑，最多也是类似不少人对文革的看法，质疑，上升不到日本右翼否认南京大屠杀的程度一一

是故意混淆两个不同的概念

Your logic is exactly the same as the Japanese.

杀人不毁尸就有一堆证据。德国若火化则比较难说。

火化6百万人很难很难比刘翔大量证据。人的骨头是几乎无法烧成灰的。

只有在高温下，这就需要燃料。比如，9.11死那么多人，就没找到什么尸骨

Why we can't compare 德国和犹太人 with 日本的南京大屠杀?

人的骨头是几乎无法烧成灰?

二者的性质不同?

查了一下，只需1000C然后简单碾碎火化骨头成灰.丙烷就可让火温度到1000C

For Germany in 1930-40s, this was something which is really easy

德国二战时能源极缺，都用了油石压碎法提炼一点是有，烧600万用什么高效的能源，而且很容易，那给点证据

Just stop to argue with him/her

I am not going to argue with you. Just do whatever you want.

当然可以比。只不过有些有意义，有些毫无关系。比如没人说德国大量屠杀中国人。