kikichichi2022-06-07 01:11:58

亲们,这是前情提要,我前房客搬走,我扣了他部分押金,我扣的绝对是他搬进来以后造成的损坏。另外,他对房屋做的所谓的improvement, 根本没有经过我同意,属于擅自安装,但是他搬入后第一年是我pm打理的,他们之间怎么协调的我不清楚,他能返回我房子拆除吗?但是他不满,要告我:

https://bbs.wenxuecity.com/tzlc/1600681.html

 

今天收到他律师给我的email,不知道是怎么查到的,但的确是我的email. 我想问下这种情况我应该怎么办,回复,还是装死,还是找律师回应。如果装死,对方告我的话,我人在加州,法院传票怎样算送达?

拜谢各位!!!

这个是他律师信如下:

=================================================================

Ms. xxx,

 

I hope this correspondence finds you well.  As you know, Mr. Hopper moved out of your property on March 31, 2022.  Accordingly, under  Revised Statute section 3251, you were required to return the deposit of $2,100, which Mr. hhh paid to your prior property manager, Ms. JJJ, by April 30, 2022. As you know, under Louisiana law, you were required to return the full amount of the deposit.   As a lessor, you may only retain any portion of the deposit which is “reasonably necessary to remedy a default of the tenant or to remedy unreasonable wear to the premises.”  In the event of any retention, the statute further requires that you provide an “itemized statement accounting for the proceeds which are retained and giving the reasons therefor.” 

 

            As of this date, Mr. HHH has yet to receive the entire deposit which was paid to your former property manager and requests immediate payment of the entire amount.  Your retention of $759.00 was improper and constitutes “wrongful withholding” of which Mr. HHH can recover $4,200.00 (two times the deposit) if immediate payment is not made.  The document you sent a photograph of to Mr. HHH evidences that your withholding was improper. You cannot charge Mr. HHH for reasonable wear and tear to the home from his four years of tenancy.  Specifically, you cannot withhold Mr. HHH’s deposit for carpet cleaning, paint touch up, and other charges of the like.  These charges were not outlined in the leasing agreement and cannot be withheld, as supported by several Louisiana cases.  

 

The photographs you sent via text to Mr. HHH are even more perplexing. As I am sure you recall, prior to Mr. HHH moving in, areas of your property were in desolate condition following your last tenant.   Mr. HHH promptly notified your prior property manager as well as you personally about the sink issue and various holes in the walls.  This is evidenced by your former property managers handwritten notes on the leasing agreement.  Despite his request, the sink remained un-repaired and the holes remained un-patched throughout the tenure of his tenancy.  Mr. HHH will not pay for those defects which he did not cause and which you did not remedy despite ample notice. 

 

As I noted from a review of the records, you are a CA resident.  I am sure it was a dream to have a tenant like Mr. HHH who kept your home in great condition for four years.  I am sure you noticed in your most recent visit (whether in accordance with recent appraisals in 2021 or otherwise) that Mr. HHH made several improvements to your house over his four years.  He installed blinds, certain ceiling fans, sod, and landscaping in your front yard.  Under Louisiana Law, Mr. Hopper has the right to reimbursement from you for the improvements made to your property, or, alternatively, he can remove the improvements.  Mr. H has not exercised this right to reimbursement nor did he remove these improvements at the end of his tenancy.   

 

I am sure that your retention of the deposit was inadvertent, and that you did not know the prior assertions of your property manager Ms. J. It has now been more than 60 days since Mr. H vacated the property. Please promptly remit payment of $759.00 or Mr. H will have to consider all remedies.

 

borisg2022-06-07 01:29:04
wait for him to sue you. it may not happen.
kikichichi2022-06-07 01:32:42
哦了!我就等传票!不跟他们废话!
oldmansea2022-06-07 03:15:56
$759可能是虚张声势,没细看,有没有哪部分合理的,退一部分了事
圆萝卜2022-06-07 03:52:27
随他去。既然走到这一步了,一分不要退还,让法官判。
kikichichi2022-06-07 04:28:18
我没有多收他!
kikichichi2022-06-07 04:29:20
我也决定死磕了!我有照片有单据,有付款记录,如果哪里收的不合理,让法官断吧!
ljty12022-06-07 05:03:00
清理房间,清理地毯是合理的charge,补漆不合理,厨房水管如果不是房客故意弄坏的也不应该房客付
ljty12022-06-07 05:04:00
我建议你退掉补漆和厨房水管那部分,没有必要激化矛盾
圭妈2022-06-07 06:15:00
我觉得很奇怪,律师要告你一般不发 email,都是发正式的邮件。
雾蒙蒙雨霏霏2022-06-07 07:26:04
装死不如装傻或者装疯,乱其八糟的回几句有一堆语法和拼写错误的回帖,让他去猜.
老朽2022-06-07 11:55:32
哈哈哈,最好错的离谱。不要凭自己英文好和大老外斗文字功夫,弄不好留下把柄。没头没脑的英文不能成为证据。
冬前2022-06-07 12:15:34
If it were me, I would just give back the $759. Understood
老朽2022-06-07 13:11:29
同意,人在外州,还759算了,不是大数,而且对方提出来的。
oldmansea2022-06-07 13:16:03
法官有可能盼你赔房客的律师费等
小饭粒2022-06-07 13:58:49
必需还759.
NPshowway2022-06-07 14:04:52
Agree
hhtt2022-06-07 14:45:22
Me no under stand you mean. ni nainaidi gao wo de le!
柠檬椰子汁2022-06-07 14:48:18
Cannot deduct wear and tear
kikichichi2022-06-07 14:48:34
盼律师费我也认了,就算是积攒经验吧
kikichichi2022-06-07 14:49:47
多谢建议,我考虑考虑!不是钱多少,我其实很想知道正常磨损的界限在哪里
kikichichi2022-06-07 14:51:06
因为他们没有我的地址,虽然也可以查出来,但是费精力, 我查了email在legal notice送达上没有法律效力
oldmansea2022-06-07 14:51:32
厨房水管坏掉为什么房客要负责?wear and tear 引起的损害也是房东负责
kikichichi2022-06-07 14:51:42
我觉得我更适合装死lol ~~~
kikichichi2022-06-07 14:53:54
其实从理智生意角度来讲就是退钱最好,还不到800,但是就是觉得不能遇事就怂,太窝囊了
kikichichi2022-06-07 14:55:25
才700多,的确不应该这么费神,得, 我听您的建议,退他得了,多谢!
柠檬椰子汁2022-06-07 14:56:11
I didn't make the rules.
kikichichi2022-06-07 14:57:20
多谢柠檬兄这么专业的答复,我听你的,退钱吧!
kikichichi2022-06-07 15:02:25
多谢建议
kikichichi2022-06-07 15:03:16
Good example for bad English! Lol~~~~~
密码忘记了2022-06-07 15:28:39
四年的老房客,一开始就应该做得漂亮一些
oldmansea2022-06-07 16:23:58
你这挺误导的,什么东西都会坏掉的,除非房客的过错造成的,都是房东的责任
oldmansea2022-06-07 16:30:28
“水管坏掉“和“房客打破了水管”是两码事。如果责任难以界定,是房东负责。法庭上房东具有举证的责任,而不是房客
oldmansea2022-06-07 18:18:26
这种索债的notice要求不高。在我们州,有email也算mail的法庭判例
柠檬椰子汁2022-06-07 18:40:36
我给的仅仅是presumption,一个起点假设。终点结论在哪里要看具体情况。
新手地主刚上路2022-06-07 19:05:07
+1
kikichichi2022-06-07 21:33:04
学习了!谢谢建议!
kikichichi2022-06-07 22:05:09
多谢建议!
oldmansea2022-06-07 22:46:22
上庭肯定输,刷漆3年后基本就没法扣了,这个光这个房客就住了4年了。楼主的收据没用,得证明是房客责任才行