文革传人2022-03-21 08:28:31

是乌克兰人 Yaroslav Hrytsak 的文章。链接在这儿:

Opinion | Putin Got Ukraine Completely Wrong - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

很长,无闲莫入。其中的主要观点,本老汉认为是如下了两段:

ZT

What happened in Ukraine in 2014 confirmed what liberal Ukrainian historians have been saying for a long time: The chief distinction between Ukrainians and Russians lies not in language, religion or culture — here they are relatively close — but in political traditions. Simply put, a victorious democratic revolution is almost impossible in Russia, whereas a viable authoritarian government is almost impossible in Ukraine.

The reason for this divergence is historical. Up until the end of World War I (and in the case of western Ukraine, the end of World War II), Ukrainian lands were under the strong political and cultural influence of Poland. This influence was not Polish per se; it was, rather, a Western influence. As the Harvard Byzantinist Ihor Sevcenko put it, in Ukraine the West was clad in Polish dress. Central to this influence were the ideas of constraining centralized power, an organized civil society and some freedom of assembly.

ZT 完毕。

papyrus2022-03-21 13:20:34
说得有理。这里波兰同事曾开玩笑说波兰和乌克兰是一个国家 :-)。再说当年的“Rzeczpospolita
未完的歌2022-03-21 15:50:44
去了解一下克里米亚战争中那个斯特列科夫,就知道比普京更贪心皇俄派的想法了。。。
daxigua012022-03-21 20:07:43
波兰,奥匈帝国都对乌克兰影响很深,而且俄罗斯导致的乌克兰两次大饥荒,是乌克兰人心中永远的痛
文革传人2022-03-22 07:25:29
再谢古纸兄的文化渗透。给大帝讲历史的人应该等同给大祖当国师的金政委,肯定没提这一段,^_^。
文革传人2022-03-22 07:26:35
谢歌兄介绍,这就去窥一窥。
文革传人2022-03-22 07:28:28
是。不久前还有网友在此细说过那个历史过程。Fool me once, twice and three times?